It seems that there either needs to be another class added (a fourth) which would fit for the example that uses Moses without changing His Station, or the 'divine encounter' class needs to be redefined in a way that makes a distinction between the human station and the station of a Manifestation of God.
This may mean re-examining things ontologically and expanding the classical ontological model to include the spiritual aspect of humans and it may mean re-examining natural law and expanding it to distinguish between the limits of the human reality and the limits of the Mainfestations of God.
The problem does not seem insurmountable. The problem of ego-driven interpretation that is solved by recognizing that there is no moral authority to intervene in the economy is no more (or less) challenging to resolve than is the problem of ego-driven interpretation in religion.
For more information go to my website.
To earn a Masters Degree in Divine Economy Theory go here.
Go here to read about MACRO & MICRO Economics Renewed.
